SUMMARYThe New Mexico Supreme Court held attorney Stephen Aarons in direct contempt after he filed an AI-generated appellate brief containing fabricated witnesses, fake police testimony, and other false claims. The court referred him to the disciplinary board and said he failed to verify the facts or legal authority before signing and submitting the filing in a murder conviction appeal for Oscar Renee Sandoval.

ChatGPT-using lawyer punished for citing fake testimony from made-up witnesses
Getty Images | NurPhoto
arstechnica.com

The New Mexico Supreme Court held a ChatGPT-using lawyer in direct contempt of court for submitting a brief with "false testimony from wholly fabricated witnesses," including fake police testimony and other mistakes. The state's top court referred the lawyer to a disciplinary board for further proceedings and concluded that he "demonstrated a lack of remorse and a lack of concern for his client."

Attorney Stephen Aarons "admitted to the Court that he did not verify the factual claims and legal authority in his AI-generated brief before signing it and filing it with the Court, and that he did not inform his client of this failure or that the brief in chief contained multiple factual and legal misrepresentations," the state Supreme Court said in an order on Wednesday.

Aarons has been a criminal defense lawyer in New Mexico for over 40 years and was hired by a defendant's family members to appeal a murder conviction. Aaron's now-former client, Oscar Renee Sandoval, was sentenced to life in prison in February 2025 after being convicted of killing Shiereen Al-Jibury, who was his partner and the mother of his children.

Read full article