SUMMARYMIT Media Lab researchers led by Pat Pataranutaporn introduced “neural transparency,” a visualization method that lets users inspect an AI chatbot’s likely traits before starting a conversation. Presented at the ACM Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces, the tool compares internal activations tied to behaviors such as empathy, honesty, toxicity, hallucination, and sycophancy, then displays the results in a sunburst diagram. In user studies, people often misjudged how personalized AI would behave, and the visualization increased trust without changing how they built their chatbots.

Pat Pataranutaporn
Photo: Jimmy Day
news.mit.edu
Pat Pataranutaporn

Millions of people are now designing their own personalized artificial intelligence companions, yet most have little idea how those creations will actually behave. In a new paper, MIT Media Lab Assistant Professor Pat Pataranutaporn and his graduate student researchers Anthony Baez and Sheer Karny introduce “neural transparency,” a tool that lets everyday users glimpse inside an AI’s neural network before their chatbot ever says a word. The work is being presented this week at the ACM Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces.

In this interview, Pataranutaporn, who is the Asahi Broadcasting Corporation CD Professor of Media Arts and Sciences, explains what they found, why the stakes are higher than most users realize, and what genuinely transparent AI might look like in the future.

Q: Your paper introduces “neural transparency,” a way to let everyday users peek inside an AI’s neural networks before their chatbot ever says a word. Can you describe how that actually works, and why you focused on the design moment, rather than catching problems after a chatbot is already out in the wild?

A: Millions of people are now creating personalized AI chatbots and agents powered by large language models, turning them into collaborators, tutors, coaches, creative partners, and companions through simple text prompts. Yet most people have very little idea how those prompts will shape the AI’s behavior until they begin interacting with it. We wanted to change that.

“Neural transparency” means giving people something like a brain scan for AI. Not because AI has a human brain, but because its neural network contains internal patterns that can hint at how it may behave before it speaks. In this work, my students Anthony Baez, Sheer Karny, and I combined insights from the fields of human-AI interaction and mechanistic interpretability to make those hidden patterns accessible to everyday users.

The basic idea is simple. First, we choose behaviors we care about, such as empathy, honesty, toxicity, hallucination, or sycophancy. Then, we compare the model’s internal activations when it is prompted to exhibit one trait versus its opposite. That difference becomes a kind of “behavior direction” inside the model. When a user writes a custom system prompt — the instructions that shape their chatbot’s personality before any conversation begins — we project the model’s internal activations onto those directions and translate the results into an intuitive visualization. In our case, this is a sunburst diagram that previews the chatbot’s likely personality traits before the user starts chatting with it.

We focused on the design moment because that is where prevention is possible. Today, people often discover problems only after the chatbot has already behaved in unintended ways. Our goal was to move from reactive correction to anticipatory design by helping people identify potential risks while they are still shaping the AI.

Q: Your study turned up something pretty striking: People consistently misjudge how their personalized AI will behave, overestimating the good traits and underestimating potentially harmful ones like sycophancy. What does that tell us about the risks baked into how millions of people are currently building AI companions, and why is that blind spot so hard to close?

A: I often joke that if AI showed up looking like the Terminator, it would be much easier for us to know what to do. The real challenge is that AI often appears as a warm friend, coach, tutor, or companion. That makes it difficult to recognize when something is going wrong.

Our study suggests that people have a blind spot when designing personalized AI. People often think they know how their chatbot will behave, but in our study they incorrectly predicted its personality on 11 of the 15 traits we measured. That highlights the need for tools that help people better understand AI before they start using it.

This matters because some behaviors that feel helpful in the moment may not be healthy over time. In previous research, we documented cases of psychological harm associated with interactions with AI chatbots. An LLM [large language model] that constantly validates your opinions or never challenges your thinking can reinforce harmful decisions, unhealthy beliefs, or emotional dependency. Psychology has long shown that people are naturally drawn to affirmation, so designing AI is not only a technical challenge, but also a psychological one.

The deeper issue is that today’s AI systems remain largely black boxes: Even experts cannot always predict how a system prompt will shape an AI’s behavior over a long conversation. As AI companions become part of everyday life, we need tools that help people understand what they are building before they begin using it. AI should be supportive without becoming blindly agreeable, personalized without becoming manipulative, and transparent enough that people can make informed choices.

Q: One of your most interesting findings is that the visualization significantly increased user trust but didn’t actually change how people designed their chatbots. What will it take to close that gap, and where do you see tools like this heading as AI companions become more deeply embedded in people’s everyday lives?

A: I actually think this is one of the most interesting findings in the paper, because it shows that transparency alone is not enough. People appreciated being able to see inside the model and reported greater trust in the system, but simply presenting information did not fundamentally change how they designed their AI companions.

In our followup work, which is currently available as a preprint, we are studying how a model’s internal neural representation changes over the course of a multi-turn conversation rather than remaining fixed from the initial prompt. We are already seeing promising results. By visualizing how these internal representations drift over time, people become significantly better at recognizing and anticipating changes in AI behavior, and are less likely to become overconfident in their understanding of the chatbot. AI companions are dynamic systems that evolve as they interact with us, so understanding those internal changes is an important next step. Nevertheless, this is still a very young research area.

Looking further ahead, I believe these kinds of transparency tools could become as commonplace as nutrition labels are for food. As AI becomes deeply woven into education, health care, work, and personal relationships, people should be able to understand not only what an AI can do, but how it may influence their thinking, emotions, and behavior. That kind of transparency is essential if we want AI to genuinely help people flourish.

OpenAI's first hardware device is a limited-edition desktop keypad called the Codex Micro that lets users monitor and control AI coding agents. Axios reports: Codex Micro is a collaboration with Work Louder, a boutique hardware company known for customizable mechanical keyboards and shortcut controllers for developers and designers. The small, square macro pad -- with backlit keys, a rotary knob and a tiny joystick -- sits beside your regular keyboard as a physical shortcut box for common Codex actions and shows the status of your agents. The keys are customizable and include a push-to-talk option as well as a dial to adjust your reasoning setting. Codex Micro is a niche device for Codex power users and will only be available until it sells out. It's priced at $230.

Image: OpenAI

OpenAI is finally releasing some hardware. No, it isn't the mysterious AI-powered device the company is developing with former Apple designer Jony Ive, a project already tangled up in a messy lawsuit. Instead, it's a product designed to be used with its coding platform, Codex.

The device, a square-shaped block of buttons called Codex Micro, is a collaboration between the AI company and keyboard maker Work Louder. OpenAI said it is a limited-run collaboration that will give users more ways to monitor and manage their agents.

The pad closely resembles Work Louder's Creator Micro 2, and marketing images show what appears to be an identical …

Read the full story at The Verge.

Thermodynamic Computers Go With the (Energy) Flowquantamagazine.org

In the quest to make computers accurate and reliable, noise is the enemy. The thermal jiggling of atoms is a constant threat to the precision needed for detailed calculations. Whether we're dealing with familiar classical devices like the laptops or supercomputers that we use today, or fancy quantum devices that promise us faster computation tomorrow, we don't want some haphazard heat fluctuation…

Source

Can a handful of engineers really do the work of an army of consultants? That’s the bet behind Ode with Anthropic — the joint venture dedicated to embedding forward-deployed engineers in enterprise firms, backed by Anthropic, Blackstone, Hellman & Friedman, Goldman Sachs and others. On this episode of TechCrunch’s Equity podcast, Rebecca Bellan sits down with Ode’s leaders Chris Taylor and Eddie Siegel, who founded Fractional AI, […]

SUMMARYPsiQuantum is pursuing a large photonic quantum computer built from hundreds of cabinets of chips that would use photons and optical switches to tackle problems beyond the reach of current machines. In Norway, engineers are building a 16.6-mile subsea road tunnel under the North Sea that will reach 1,280 feet below the surface, becoming the world’s longest and deepest of its kind.

This is today’s edition of The Download, our weekday newsletter that provides a daily dose of what’s going on in the world of technology.

PsiQuantum has a plan to make a massive quantum computer out of light

The machine that could change the world will be housed in a room that looks like a data center crossed with an ice cream factory.

Inside, some 100 stainless-steel cabinets each hold hundreds of chips. On those chips, thousands of light particles will fly through a maze of optical switches and beam splitters. Each photon must be accounted for, because precisely measuring where it ends up will help answer questions that current computers might take millions of years to solve.

This computer, as described, does not exist. It’s the brainchild of a company called PsiQuantum, founded in 2016 by four physicists from UK universities. In a crowded field of deep-pocketed competitors with similarly fantastical visions, the company aims to be the first to build a useful quantum machine.

Read the full story on the company’s quest.

—James O’Donnell

MIT Technology Review Narrated: inside the world’s deepest and longest subsea road tunnel

—Niall Firth

I’m currently around 1,000 feet beneath the North Sea, in a dark, dank cave. It smells weird. And I’m increasingly aware of the pressure from millions of tons of seawater just above my head.

I’m under the iconic fjords of Norway to visit what will soon become the world’s longest and deepest subsea road tunnel—an exceptional engineering feat that will carry drivers deep beneath the North Sea.

I’m here to understand how you make a 16.6-mile highway that sits 1,280 feet below the sea at its deepest point. And also—at a time when it can feel hard to get anything done—to reassure myself that ambitious engineering is still possible. That we can still make things.


This is our latest
story to be turned into an MIT Technology Review Narrated podcast, which we publish each week on Spotify and Apple Podcasts. Just navigate to MIT Technology Review Narrated on either platform, and follow us to get all our new content as it’s released.

The must-reads

I’ve combed the internet to find you today’s most fun/important/scary/fascinating stories about technology.

1 Meta allegedly used AI to target workers with health issues for layoffs
Their lawsuit says Meta relied on AI to create a termination list. (Guardian)
+ And pinpointed staff who took maternity or disability leave. (Reuters $)
+ One was allegedly informed the day before her water broke. (Ars Technica)
+ The layoffs aimed to offset Meta’s AI spending. (Gizmodo)
+ AI agents are not your “coworkers.” (MIT Technology Review)

2 OpenAI’s first consumer device will be a mobile smart speaker
The screenless device will serve as an “AI companion.” (Bloomberg $)
+ It’ll let you talk with ChatGPT. (Verge)
+ And use a camera and sensor to understand your environment. (Reuters $)
+ It’s set to launch next year. (Engadget)

3 The US military sent explosive drone boats into combat for the first time
They attacked an Iranian midget submarine and naval port. (Ars Technica)
+ Underwater drones may shape a war in Taiwan. (MIT Technology Review)

4 DeepMind’s CEO has called for a US-led body to test frontier AI models
Demis Hassabis wants the watchdog to vet national security threats. (FT $)
+ If dangers mount, it would coordinate an industry-wide slowdown. (Axios)

5 Data centers are set to add billions in power costs in 13 states
A power auction is slated to produce $6.3 billion in new charges. (NYT $)
+ Australia plans to govern the use of water and power for AI. (WSJ $)

6 xAI’s unpermitted power pollution hits Black communities hardest
Elon Musk’s xAI has been installing gas turbines without permits. (Reuters $)
+ We need to focus on Big Tech’s energy footprint. (MIT Technology Review)

7 Stripe and Advent have offered to buy PayPal for more than $53 billion
The payments giant and private equity firm have made a joint bid. (Reuters $)
+ Apple and Google Pay have eroded PayPal’s market share. (Bloomberg $)

8 DeepSeek plans to file for IPO as soon as this year
The Chinese AI pioneer is likely to list in Shanghai. (WSJ $)
+ Here’s why DeepSeek’s latest model matters. (MIT Technology Review)

9 A hard, lightweight “bio-metal” has been discovered in sea worm jaws
It could have applications in engineering. (New Scientist $)

10 A new $3,000 fitness suit electrocutes you to boost your gains
Celebrities love it—but not everyone’s a fan. (404 Media)

Quote of the day

“By economic and engineering measures, generative AI might be the worst technology ever deployed.”

—Alex Reisner, a staff writer at The Atlantic, explains why GenAI’s scaling problem is an engineering disaster.

One More Thing

""
FRANZISKA BARCZYK


Hackers made death threats against this security researcher. Big mistake.

In April 2024, an anonymous hacker began posting death threats on Telegram and Discord channels aimed at a cybersecurity researcher named Allison Nixon. It wasn’t long before others piled on. Someone shared AI-generated nudes of her.

They targeted Nixon because she had become a formidable threat. As chief research officer at the cyber investigations firm Unit 221B, named after Sherlock Holmes’s apartment, she had built a career tracking cybercriminals and helping get them arrested.

For years, Nixon had lurked quietly in online chat channels or used pseudonyms to engage with perpetrators and bring them to justice. Now, she resolved to unmask the people behind the death threats—and take them down for crimes they admitted to committing.

Find out why they learned to regret their choice of target.

—Kim Zetter

We can still have nice things

A place for comfort, fun, and distraction to brighten up your day. (Got any ideas? Drop me a line.)

+ A musician has discovered the true masters of metal breakdowns: birds.
+ Photographer Fontanesi’s surreal photo splits transform everyday images into spectacular hybrid scenes.
+ Over 30 actors, filmmakers, and friends recount how Steven Spielberg infiltrated Hollywood in this terrific article.
+ Who would win the World Cup if less important things than soccer decided it, like life expectancy and happiness? A new game tests your knowledge.

SUMMARYAstronauts on SpaceX’s Fram2 mission captured the first diagnostic X-ray images in orbit, using a portable MinXray device after only four hours of training. The scans of body parts and a smartwatch were later reviewed by radiologists and found to be largely comparable to Earth-based images, marking a new medical imaging capability for spaceflight. Researchers hope the result will support future long-duration missions by giving crews another way to diagnose injuries and inspect equipment.

Astronauts on SpaceX's Fram2 mission successfully captured diagnostic X-ray images in orbit for the first time. The milestone gives space medicine a second imaging option beyond ultrasound and could help future crews diagnose injuries, inspect equipment, and support longer missions to the moon or beyond. Popular Science reports: Commercial off-the-shelf X-ray machines like the ice cooler-sized MinXray TR90BH now allow users to perform scans on subjects far away from traditional facilities. In 2022, [Mayo Clinic researcher Sheyna Gifford] assisted in preparing a crew to successfully generate digital X-rays while experiencing microgravity during a parabolic flight. Gifford's team then spent years collaborating with SpaceX to plan another feasibility study. This time, they didn't want to operate an X-ray machine aboard an aircraft simulating the conditions in space -- they intended to use the equipment during an orbital mission.

The process was detailed in a recently published study in the journal Radiology, and focuses on last year's Fram2 mission. Instead of days of medical training, astronauts spent only four hours learning how to use their portable radiography device. They then took preflight X-rays of a hand, forearm, chest, abdomen, and pelvis ahead of their SpaceX Falcon 9 rocket launch on March 31, 2025. Once in orbit, the team calibrated the system before testing their MinXray on the same body parts as well as a smartwatch.

Once the crew returned, a trio of independent radiologists reviewed the orbital X-ray images based on their positioning, spatial and contrast resolutions, and general scan quality. Although positioning scores were slightly decreased for the central body images, every other scan held up to similar examples created on Earth. Meanwhile, the astronauts reported that using the machine was easy despite minimal prior coaching. Looking ahead, researchers hope to conduct further X-ray tests during orbital missions, while continuing to reduce the overall size of equipment.

Image: SpaceX
The smaller Starlink V5 (right) next to the larger V4 dish. | Image: SpaceX

SpaceX's latest residential dish - the Starlink V5 - is now available in "select areas." It's notably smaller and lighter than the V4 dish with improved power efficiency. It'll be available in more places as SpaceX ramps up production to meet global demand. The company notes that Starlink V5 is not intended for in-motion use - for that you'll have to wait for the revamped Starlink Mini teased alongside the V5 last month.

The next generation Starlink Kit is designed to deliver reliable, high-speed home internet. Starlink V5 has a smaller form factor and lightweight design with greater power efficiency than the Starlink V4.

With speeds up to …

Read the full story at The Verge.

SUMMARYOpenAI is developing a screenless, portable smart speaker that will act as a personalized AI companion and home computer. The device is expected to support smart-home control, media playback, messaging, and proactive assistance using an advanced version of ChatGPT voice mode, with a camera, sensors, and a rechargeable battery for room-to-room use. OpenAI plans to unveil it this year and release it in 2027 after acquiring Jony Ive’s io Products.

OpenAI is reportedly developing a screen-free, portable smart speaker meant to act as a personalized home computer and humanlike AI companion. "It will help control smart-home appliances, play media, answer questions, respond to messages and tap into the range of capabilities offered by OpenAI's ChatGPT," reports Bloomberg, citing people familiar with the matter. The device, expected to be unveiled this year and released in 2027, would mark OpenAI's first major hardware push after acquiring Jony Ive's io Products. Bloomberg reports: Apple sued OpenAI last week, accusing the company of stealing trade secrets. But OpenAI believes that the device veers significantly from anything Apple has on the market today and that it's unlikely that it violates trade secrets belonging to the iPhone maker, the people said. OpenAI's success in hardware will hinge on bringing a novel approach to the market -- something it aims to do with the smart speaker. For instance, the device's technology is meant to become increasingly personalized and proactive as it gains a deeper understanding of its owner over time, according to the people.

OpenAI envisions the device anticipating needs, surfacing information proactively and serving as an expert on its user, they said. Though the speaker is designed to stay in the home, it will be easy to move around the house. OpenAI believes the product's defining feature will be its personality and ability to connect on a humanlike level with users. The speaker incorporates mechanical elements that can move on their own, creating a sense that it is alive and not just an object responding to commands. The machine also will draw on personal information such as emails to better understand its owner. The goal is for the device to feel like a companion and become a physical manifestation of OpenAI's ChatGPT. Still, the exact plans could change as the company works through the development and legal process.

The device's communication abilities will rely on a more advanced version of the ChatGPT Voice Mode -- GPT-Live -- that OpenAI rolled out this month. The new voice mode is designed to act more like a human. It can listen and talk at the same time, adapt more naturally during conversations, and quickly process information. Though the new product resembles a speaker, OpenAI internally describes it as the first of its kind: a computer built for AI to help make busy people more productive. It includes a camera and other sensors that help it understand a user's surroundings and context, as well as advanced AI models beyond those available on conventional smart speakers. Another central difference is that the device includes a rechargeable battery, allowing it to be carried from room to room throughout the day. A user could bring it into the laundry room while doing chores, move it into the kitchen for cooking assistance, and later place it in a living room or bedroom to have it play music. It can also remain plugged into a single room if the customer chooses.

SUMMARYGoogle Images is getting a Pinterest-like redesign with a personalized “For You” feed, real-time image updates, and collections for saving ideas such as outfits, travel inspiration, and room design. Google is also adding image generation in Search through AI Overviews using its Nano Banana model, letting users turn text prompts into custom visuals and preview design ideas for spaces.

Google Images is getting a Pinterest-like redesign that turns image search into a personalized discovery feed, with "For You" galleries, real-time updates, and collections for saving visual ideas. "Google is also adding a way for users to create AI images right in Search, as it celebrates 25 years since the debut of Google Images," reports TechCrunch. From the report: After navigating to the redesigned Google Images, users will see a "For You" gallery of images tailored to their interests and browsing history. Like Pinterest, the gallery is designed for continuous browsing, with Google saying it updates in real time with new images. As users browse, they can save ideas to their "collections," which will appear as tabs above the main gallery of photos. For example, users can create collections for things like vacation outfit ideas, travel inspiration, and ways to design a reading nook, which they can come back to later.

[...] As for generating images directly in Search, Google says the feature is meant for moments when you have a highly specific idea for an image that doesn't already exist online. Google is bringing image generation directly into AI Overviews on Search and will use its latest Nano Banana model to transform a text prompt into a custom visual. The feature can also help users reimagine spaces and visualize ideas, such as seeing what a room might look like painted red or what a dorm room with a coastal theme could look like.

Image: The Verge

OpenAI's first device is set to be a smart speaker that lets you talk with ChatGPT, according to a report from Bloomberg. The device apparently won't have a screen, but will use a camera and additional sensors to "understand" your environment.

The report comes just days after Apple filed a lawsuit against OpenAI that accused the AI company of stealing hardware secrets. OpenAI, in a new statement on Tuesday, said that it is "not aware of any evidence that this complaint has merit."

Sources tell Bloomberg that OpenAI's device will also feature a rechargeable battery that will allow users to carry it with them. It will offer smart home contro …

Read the full story at The Verge.

SUMMARYMIT researcher Devavrat Shah developed a foundation model for tabular and time-series data that helps businesses forecast, plan, and make decisions using their own enterprise data. His work led to Ikigai Labs, which was patented and licensed by MIT, and the company was later acquired by Celonis, where Shah became chief scientist. The system is designed to analyze digitized business processes at scale and simulate outcomes for different choices in real time.

While most AI models have been taught using text and images, a system developed by Devavrat Shah takes tabular data as its input — structured data such as the row-and-column format used in spreadsheets — and then provides real-time planning on a large scale.news.mit.edu
While most AI models have been taught using text and images, a system developed by Devavrat Shah takes tabular data as its input — structured data such as the row-and-column format used in spreadsheets — and then provides real-time planning on a large scale.

Systems using artificial intelligence to enhance forecasting, planning, and decision-making in businesses have been proliferating in recent years, but in many cases, they lack the detailed, specific information about the organization itself, limiting the usefulness of those tools.

Devavrat Shah, a principal investigator at MIT’s Laboratory for Information and Decision Systems (LIDS), faculty member with the department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science (EECS), and member of the Institute for Data, Systems, and Society (IDSS), has been focused on how to design methods that can handle second-by-second decision-making using limited computational resources.

“In a sense, with a small amount of resource, you have to do a lot of heavy lifting,” he says. As a researcher, “my interest is in the ability to develop methods that can extract information from data at scale in as effective a manner as possible.”

The Andrew (1956) and Erna Viterbi Professor has been teaching at MIT since 2005.

In 2019, he also co-founded a spinoff company called Ikigai Labs. Ikigai built a foundation model for tabular, time series data based on years of research in Shah’s lab, which was patented and licensed by MIT to the company. This model can take input from enterprise data from varied sources, continuously and at scale, so that it learns as it goes along by testing its predictions against real outcomes.

Shah explains that the system is an extension of the kind of graphical models that are used, for example, by GPS devices to convert a sparse amount of data received from satellites into an accurate model of a position on the Earth’s surface, or by communication system like that in a digital watch that communicates at high speed in an energy-efficient manner.

“My interest was: How does one design such graphical models for generic, tabular data?” he says.

While most AI models have been taught using text and images, this system takes tabular data as its input — structured data such as the familiar kind of row-and-column format used in spreadsheets. And then it provides the kind of real-time planning, on a vastly larger scale.

The idea for Ikigai was to provide forecasting and decision-making technology for large businesses, such as consumer goods manufacturers and pharmaceutical companies.

Shah gives the example of how a consumer electronics company might use this system.

“Let’s say you’re making headphones and all sorts of different things. And each of the products that you manufacture has lots of small pieces that come from different parts of the world. And once the device is sold, it needs to be supported and maintained. And you have to come up with new versions of the product, you have to market them, you have to price them … So the questions you would typically ask would be: If I were to sell these next quarter or next year, how many will be sold in different places, and what would happen to demand if I change the price, or if I introduce promotion?”

He adds that all of these processes are interdependent, and at every stage of the processes decisions have to be made that have implications over time. “At some level,” he says, “digitizing these processes and being able to do predictions and constantly optimize is what leads to ultimately better business operations.”

Ikigai was recently acquired by the international firm Celonis, where Shah is now chief scientist in addition to his roles at MIT. Ultimately, he hopes the model he developed for Ikigai will help Celonis deliver tools that can integrate with a company’s own data and business processes in order to provide real-world analyses that can help make forecasts, plans, and decisions.

Shah adds that Celonis has specialized in digitizing and automating operations for more than 1,400 large companies around the world. Now that these systems are fully digitized, they provide a platform for Ikigai’s software to take the next step, reading the data from these digitized systems in order to provide detailed models to allow simulation of different options, predict optimum strategies, and forecast the results of a given set of decisions.

“Once the digital layer of these processes exists and this information layer exists,” Shah says, “now, on top of it, we can put the Ikigai stack to enable decision-making at a much larger scale than otherwise.”

While so many companies are working on various aspects of AI, “we are very much focused on part of the domain that the rest of the world is not paying attention to,” which is the area of structured or time-domain data. By starting from such data, he says, it provides a very cost-effective version of AI.

“A narrower focus comes with sharper technology,” he says, “but it’s broad enough that it’s very valuable.”

Shah adds, “The recent buzzword that’s become pertinent in the modern AI popular press is a ‘world model.’ In a sense, this is trying to build the enterprise process world model, so to speak.”

If you’ve been waiting to try Apple’s revamped Siri without installing a developer beta, you now can. The company on Tuesday released the iOS 27 public beta, giving iPhone owners early access to its AI-powered assistant and other new features before the software’s official launch this fall.

Today, the Linux Foundation launched the x402 Foundation to standardize internet-native payments for AI agents, APIs, and applications, based on Coinbase's contributed x402 protocol. Backed by companies including AWS, American Express, Cloudflare, Google, Mastercard, Stripe, and Visa, the effort aims to make payments work directly over HTTP (assuming users are comfortable letting AI agents handle financial transactions).

"The whole idea is to give agents access to money and, through that financial independence, improve their set of capabilities to pretty much anything on the internet," Lincoln Murr, Coinbase's AI product lead, told CNBC last month when the company announced the protocol. "In the 2010s, every internet company dealt with the transition from desktop and web into a mobile environment. And now in the late 2020s, we're seeing the exact same thing happen where agents are going to be the new primary economic actors on the internet."

SUMMARYMIT’s inaugural JARVIS Challenge asked 31 undergraduates to use AI tools to design, fabricate, assemble, and test a small gas turbine engine in four weeks. Team 811 Crew won after its jet engine started, switched to Jet-A fuel, and produced net thrust, while other finalists showed both the promise and limits of AI in safety-critical hardware engineering. Faculty and sponsors said the competition demonstrated how AI can speed design-build-test cycles when paired with strong engineering judgment and hands-on experience.

Faculty and TAs for the JARVIS Challenge were on hand throughout the competition to ensure safety, but students had to figure out their designs with minimal guidance. Here, Professor Zolti Spakovszky (center) helps team 811 Crew fire their jet engine. 
Professor Zolti Spakovszky (center) helped Team 811 Crew, winners of the JARVIS Challenge, fire their jet engine.
news.mit.edu
Faculty and TAs for the JARVIS Challenge were on hand throughout the competition to ensure safety, but students had to figure out their designs with minimal guidance. Here, Professor Zolti Spakovszky (center) helps team 811 Crew fire their jet engine.

Artificial intelligence has rapidly transformed software engineering. Generative AI and large language models (LLMs) can create huge volumes of code and documentation; machine-learning algorithms can monitor performance and detect security vulnerabilities. But when the task is to conceive, design, and make a complex physical system such as a jet engine, are those AI tools equally transformative?

This past semester, the JARVIS Challenge (Jet-engine AI Research and Validation Intensive Sprint) set out to explore whether AI can compress the design-build-test cycle, asking MIT undergraduates to discover whether AI can help them to build faster and better.

“The JARVIS challenge showed that AI can substantially accelerate safety-critical hardware engineering, but engineering judgment remains the decisive differentiator. An AI-native engineer is not defined by using AI, but by leading it — knowing when to trust it, when to challenge it, and how to translate AI outputs into working hardware. Manufacturing — not engineering design or analysis — remained the fundamental rate-limiting step,” says Professor Zolti Spakovszky, director of the MIT Gas Turbine Laboratory.

The teams, the tools, the task

The challenge gave undergraduates four weeks to design, fabricate, assemble, and test a small gas turbine aero engine, using AI as their primary engineering partner. The objective: build a “JARVIS-class” single-spool jet engine producing 50–100 pounds of thrust, running on Jet-A, and completing five 60-second runs. Teams had total freedom over design, materials, and fabrication.

Representing nearly every department in the School of Engineering, 31 students organized into seven teams, ranging from all first-years to senior-heavy groups. Many of the competitors initially had little experience in turbomachinery, compressible flows, or, in the case of the younger students, even thermodynamics. Many had never seen the inside of a gas turbine before signing up to build one.

At their disposal: MIT’s machine shops and manufacturing vendors; commercial software including Concepts NREC, SolidWorks, and ABAQUS; and various test rigs for characterizing and assembling individual components.

The teams also had access to MIT Parley, a newly launched platform that aggregates frontier large language models through a single interface. Through Parley, JARVIS leads could see directly how the students were using the AI tools, including their prompts, the cost per prompt, the specific LLMs being used, and other critical information. The JARVIS leads secured early access to Parley for all participants, and with financial support from MIT Lincoln Laboratory, the Department of Mechanical Engineering, and corporate sponsors Safran, Voyager Technologies, and Beehive Industries, students had access to essentially unlimited use of AI.

The sponsors were drawn by recruiting interest and genuine curiosity about how AI might reshape engineering workflows.

“We see this as the future of engineering,” Ryan (Hal) Hefron of Voyager Technologies told the students. “You’re honing skills that are not just nice to have — they’re going to be the future baseline in the engineering workforce.”

Vincent Garnier, managing director of Safran Tech, watched the competition unfold with excitement. “JARVIS was a genuine experiment, a learning endeavor. We frankly didn’t know what to expect, from the students or from the AI models. What struck me coming from the students was: first, the enthusiasm to explore; then, as the project developed, they all came to the cool-headed realization of what AI could or could not help them with, and then almost instantly adapted for that,” he says. “It makes me confident that this generation of leading engineers will probably not fall prey to easy and shortsighted use of AI, and will do so by keeping ever more in contact with experiments — physical or thought experiments.”

The faculty leadership — professors Zachary Cordero, Zolti Spakovszky, Masha Folk, and Andreea Bobu of the Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics, along with Lincoln Laboratory engineers and a team of teaching assistants — were there to ensure safety. In weekly progress reviews, they would critically evaluate the student progress and assess how the students were using AI.

Spakovszky developed a careful technique for guiding teams in the right direction without giving away answers or providing help. After a team’s presentation, he might ask: “Do you know what a rabbet fit is? Take in the comment.”

Where AI helps and hurts

By the end of week 1, one team withdrew from the competition; the others had, with varying degrees of success, developed an initial design for their gas turbines. Different teams used AI to summarize textbooks, teach them to use design software, source vendors, create Excel sheets, answer specific questions, find references, and create comparative analysis between design decisions. One team created an agent in Parley and tasked it with serving as their project manager.

By week 2, teams had to start working on detailed CAD designs, ordering parts, and prototyping their combustors. This is where the teams started to hit limitations in their use of AI. While Claude and ChatGPT were good at offering design alternatives and filling knowledge gaps, teams found that the hallucinations, sycophancy, and lack of physical understanding that have become notorious features of generative AI were undermining their confidence and slowing them down.

“AI is a helpful tool, great at finding information, helping organize things, and can write well, but it can’t do design,” says Elizabeth Tupaj, a member of team 811 Crew. “The moment the engineer doesn’t know what is going on and the AI is in charge is the moment the design becomes unreliable, at least with AI at its present capabilities.”

Teaching assistant John Zhang notes, “seeing this firsthand with the students reminded me how much first impressions matter. If the students couldn’t get answers from the AI early on, they quickly grew frustrated and formed a lasting opinion that precluded them from using it later.”

In the final weeks, the finalists hit another obstacle no AI could solve: working with vendors. “AI searches found vendors we had no rapport with, who had no interest in our tight timeline,” students reported. “The vendors who came through were the ones our team had personal relationships with.”

Of the three finalists, only Fast and Fractured achieved first-attempt ignition of their mini-combustor. The team had used AI heavily for trade studies and architecture comparisons, arriving at a viable design despite none of them having prior gas turbine experience.

“The JARVIS Challenge showed what’s possible when you combine AI-enabled design with motivated students and a culture of rapid experimentation,” says Masha Folk, the Charles Stark Draper Career Development Professor of Aeronautics and Astronautics. “The moment that stood out most was when the first student-designed combustor was installed on the test stand. It ignited flawlessly, ramped to full power, transitioned to dual-fuel operation, and then sustained stable combustion on 100 percent Jet-A fuel. This was proof that we can dramatically accelerate the cycle of design, build, and test while giving students hands-on experience with a real engineering challenge.”

At the vanguard of AI-native engineering

By the end of May, the two more senior teams – Fast and Fractured and 811 Crew – had completed full engine tests. Fast and Fractured, with their AI-assisted design, were delayed by vendor headaches week after week, but finally made it to test. Unfortunately, their hot fire was cut short when the rotor rubbed and seized against the stationary housing. Team 811 Crew, however, who had more exposure to turbomachinery and propulsion concepts going into the competition, emerged victorious. Their engine started, successfully transitioned to Jet-A, and generated net thrust.

“As we stood there with the air-starter, hearing their engines spool up and watching them spit fire, it felt like my heart was racing out of my chest. There were so many ways it could go wrong! What these students accomplished in such a short time span is nothing short of amazing,” says PhD student Joe Chiapperi.

The 811 team had been resistant to using AI throughout the competition, trusting instead to their fundamentals and teamwork. “We had people who were at least somewhat familiar with the design software, mechanical engineers who knew how to build anything, and aerospace engineers who had taken classes on the design of gas turbine engines specifically,” says Tupaj.

From the start of the JARVIS Challenge, younger students used Parley more frequently and cleverly, while the juniors and seniors leveraged deeper experience.

“JARVIS taught me that getting value from AI takes two things: enough expertise to judge what it tells you and catch it when it’s wrong, and enough curiosity to actually lean on it where it could help,” says Professor Andreea Bobu. “The team that moved fastest in the sprint was experienced and leaned heavily on AI to get there. The team that eventually won was more resistant to AI; they had the expertise, but that skepticism made them slower. The sweet spot seems to be knowing enough to stay in charge of the tool, and being eager enough to pick it up in the first place. To me, that’s the real opportunity ahead: training the next generation of engineers who have the judgment to direct these AI tools and the instinct to reach for them.”

The competition’s clearest finding: engineering experience is a multiplier, and the human factor remains a vital element. Mastering the first principles and fundamental concepts breeds good engineering judgment and the ability to navigate strings of tough decisions in the face of incomplete information. And when it comes to building safety-critical physical systems, nothing can replace human hands and human accountability.

“JARVIS has shown that AI copilots can have a multiplicative effect on engineering productivity, with judgment and first-principles thinking serving as the key differentiators among teams,” adds teaching assistant Kyle Woody.

But the implications of AI in aerospace are significant. If small teams using well-managed AI copilots can compress design-build-test cycles from years to weeks, the consequences for workforce structure, R&D timelines, and competitive dynamics could be substantial. The students who tackled the JARVIS Challenge are among the first engineers to grapple with those stakes not as a thought experiment, but in a machine shop, with a jet engine on the test stand.

“JARVIS highlighted the power of AI in the design of physical systems,” says Cordero, associate director of the MIT Gas Turbine Laboratory. “But it also showed that the key to unlocking that power is education, through coursework, internships, and hands-on extracurriculars like MIT Motorsports and Rocket Team. Performance in JARVIS correlated strongly with year in school. My main takeaway is that in the AI era, education is more valuable than ever.”

SUMMARYResearchers at Pennsylvania State University developed a conductive ink that can be painted directly onto skin in colorful custom designs and dries into a functional electrode for biomonitoring. The work, published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, aims to make epidermal electronics more usable on curved or hairy body areas where traditional temporary tattoo sensors struggle. The approach could support more flexible wearable biosensors for measuring signals such as temperature, strain, and other physiological data.

These painted e-tattoos could be the future of wearable biosensors
Wanqing Zhang
arstechnica.com

Credit: Wanqing Zhang

Scientists at Pennsylvania State University have developed a novel conductive ink that can be painted directly onto the skin in colorful custom designs, turning into a functional electrode for biomonitoring after drying. They described their work in a new paper published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS).

As previously reported, epidermal electronics attached to the skin via temporary tattoos (e-tattoos) have been around for more than a decade. So-called e-tattoos connect to skin without adhesives, are practically unnoticeable, and are typically attached via temporary tattoo, allowing electrical measurements (and other measurements, such as temperature and strain) using ultra-thin polymers with embedded circuit elements.

However, these e-tattoos have their limitations, most notably that they don’t function well on curved and/or hairy surfaces, as well as requiring personalized electrode placement design to cover larger areas, since biosignals are spatially distributed. So scientists have been getting creative. For instance, in 2024, researchers developed special polymer-based conductive inks that can be printed onto a person’s scalp to measure brain waves, even if they have hair. This could one day enable mobile EEG monitoring outside a clinical setting, among other potential applications.

Read full article

Google is announcing a big change to the Google Images homepage in honor of the platform's 25th anniversary this week. Instead of a mostly blank page with a search bar, the homepage will soon show you a bunch of images that it thinks you might like before you even start searching.

The company says the new "browseable" homepage features a "dynamic, immersive gallery of images from across the web - updated in real time and intelligently tailored to your unique interests." Based on images Google has shared, the layout reminds me of platforms like Pinterest and Imgur that stuff a lot of images in one place for you to scroll through. You'll also …

Read the full story at The Verge.

The “Talk to Spotify” chatbot feature rolling out to Premium users.
Image: Spotify
This is what the “Talk to Spotify” chatbox (left) looks like on the homepage. | Image: Spotify

Spotify is experimenting with a new AI feature that allows Premium subscribers to play and explore music, audiobooks, and podcasts by having conversations with a chatbot. The "Talk to Spotify" feature appears across the Home and Now Playing view on Spotify's mobile app. You can interact with the chatbot by typing your request in the familiar AI text box, or by selecting the mic symbol and speaking.

Amazon Music introduced a similar feature last year when it integrated Alexa Plus into the service. Spotify's chatbot goes a step beyond providing AI-powered recommendations and general trivia, however, because it references your playlists, favor …

Read the full story at The Verge.

SUMMARYAnthropic launched Claude for Teachers, a free offering for verified U.S. K-12 educators that provides premium Claude access, lesson-planning skills, and connections to standards-aligned curricula and classroom tools. The product is designed to help teachers differentiate instruction, analyze class data, and automate routine tasks while protecting student data under K-12 privacy terms. Anthropic also released an AI fluency course for teachers and plans a pilot with Detroit Public Schools Community District.

We're introducing Claude for Teachers, providing verified K-12 educators in the US free access to premium Claude capabilities, a library of teaching skills, and a direct connection to evidence-based curricula, mapped to academic standards in all 50 states.

Why we’re building for teachers

Decades of research show that practices like differentiation, mastery-based learning, and small group instruction reliably improve student achievement, but teachers are often short on time and resources to implement them. Budgets are stretched, classes may be too large to meet every student's individual needs, and planning often spills into evenings. This strain is heaviest in under-resourced schools. Claude for Teachers is designed to close the gap between educational best practices and what a teacher's week allows.

Early evidence suggests that while the impact of AI tools for students is mixed and depends on the implementation, AI tools for teachers can strengthen instructional practice and improve student outcomes. This is the aim of Claude for Teachers: support the craft behind great teaching and protect what teachers value most—time with their students.

Connected to evidence-based curricula and the K-12 ecosystem

Claude for Teachers connects to Learning Commons, giving Claude access to academic standards across all 50 states—and beneath each standard, the smaller learning competencies it's built from and the order students typically learn them. So when Claude drafts a lesson plan, it’s scaffolded and aligned to teaching standards. Claude for Teachers also brings in trusted curricular resources like OpenSciEd and IM v.360 from Illustrative Mathematics.

As of today, educators can now connect Claude across an entire ecosystem of K-12 tools.

  • ASSISTments: Generate auto-scored, standards-aligned math problems for practice and assessment.
  • Brisk Teaching: Create interactive student activities and standards-aligned lessons, turning your ideas into classroom-ready materials in seconds.
  • Canva Education: Turn lesson materials into classroom-ready designs and interactive learning experiences.
  • Coteach: Create high-quality math diagrams grounded in K-12 curriculum.
  • Diffit: Create and adapt instructional materials for every student.
  • Eedi: Generate diagnostic questions that go beyond right and wrong to reveal student thinking and deepen insights, in both English and Spanish.
  • MagicSchool: Make instructional content classroom-ready.
  • Snorkl: Get insights about your classes, assignments, and student progress to inform your instruction.
  • TeachFX: Get personalized instructional feedback grounded in real classroom talk.

How it works

Once verified, K-12 educators in the US get access to Claude for Teachers with the Learning Commons connector and a set of tailored teaching skills grounded in learning science. The skills, co-developed with Learning Commons, were designed around the tasks teachers told us mattered most. These were evaluated to ensure rigor, pedagogical alignment, and classroom usability, and refined through early feedback from classroom teachers, including those in schools like Prospect Schools in Brooklyn.

  • Plan a lesson from high-quality instructional materials. Ask for a lesson and Claude draws on widely used curricula mapped to your state's standards, as well as fine-grained learning components and progressions beneath them, then drafts a plan and student-facing materials you can revise and take into class.
  • Differentiate for every learner in your room. Ask Claude to adapt materials for students at different readiness levels and it builds a differentiation plan for you, plus personalized student-facing materials for each proficiency level. The scaffolds make materials accessible to students, while students who are ready can be further challenged.

Claude for Teachers includes Claude Code and Cowork, which means Claude can carry work forward on its own. Some examples:

  • Analyze class data to plan instruction. Hand Claude a folder of data—roster, diagnostics, attendance, your own notes—and it builds a clear picture of where every student is, allowing teachers to better tailor instruction. You control what data is shared; nothing you share is used in model training.
  • Schedule repeated tasks. Hand off a task once—like reviewing each day's exit tickets to see what students mastered and adapting tomorrow's plan to match—and it runs every school day at 4pm. Claude works while you drive home.

Learn more from two teachers, Zac and Karina, explaining how they use Claude for Teachers in their own classrooms.

Built for educators, safe with student data

Claude for Teachers is for educators only, consistent with Claude's 18-and-over policy. It comes with its own teacher terms, built for K-12 privacy. Claude for Teachers data is not used for model training purposes, and student information is protected by our K-12 Data Processing Addendum, written to comply with FERPA.

We’re also working with the American Federation of Teachers to align our terms and privacy practices with gold standards they’re developing:

“We've been working with Anthropic on a Gold Standard that sets out industry best practices for safety and privacy in K-12 education,” said Randi Weingarten, President of the American Federation of Teachers. “It’s important that Anthropic is committing to these principles in their new Claude for Teachers — a tool designed by and for educators to assist them instructionally and hopefully give them more time for the human relationships at the heart of learning.”

You can read more about our K-12 data privacy standards for Claude for Teachers here.

AI fluency for teachers

Teachers can also access our newly released AI Fluency for K-12 Teachers, a course co-created with Teach for America, and a train-the-trainer module co-created with the American Federation of Teachers. The guidance is model-agnostic, Creative Commons-licensed, and practical, covering which classroom tasks AI is suited for and how to use it responsibly with students.

Sharing what we build

This product stems from Anthropic's broader efforts in education, focused on supporting teachers and improving learning outcomes for students. As part of our Beneficial Deployments mission, we’re releasing a set of public goods to support the community focused on building for teachers.

This includes the launch of new connectors in Anthropic’s directory, an open-source repository of the teaching skills, and a technical write-up of how we evaluated these skills and how other builders in education can use them. We’ll pilot an evaluation of Claude for Teachers in the Detroit Public Schools Community District, working closely with teachers to study the impact on educator well-being and practice. Together, these efforts support the goals of our partnership with the Gates Foundation to co-develop tools that improve educational outcomes for K-12 students. In addition, Playlab will support a national network of lab schools in implementing AI, helping educators become builders of the AI tools used in their classrooms.

Getting started

Once verified, educators can access Claude for Teachers entirely free. Sign up by June 30, 2027 for a full year of access.

Claude for Teachers is for individual educators. A dedicated offering for schools and districts is coming soon. In the meantime, districts interested in Claude can continue using Claude for Nonprofits.

SUMMARYAnthropic committed $10 million CAD to Canadian research institutions, including Amii, Mila, the Vector Institute, CHEO, CAMH, Université Laval, the University of Toronto, and the University of Saskatchewan. The funding will support work on responsible AI, health, scientific research, low-resource languages, and startup development through Claude credits and API access. Anthropic also released a Canadian AI usage brief showing Canada ranks eighth globally in Claude.ai use and second by its adoption index.

Le français suit.

Canadian institutions and researchers have played a critical role in the modern AI era. During a period of broad skepticism about research into neural networks, the University of Toronto and the Université de Montréal were two of only a handful of institutions that incubated this crucial line of work, while researchers at the University of Alberta did pioneering work on reinforcement learning. And in the early 2010s, Canadian research institutions led the way in demonstrating that with the arrival of powerful new computing resources—in particular, general-purpose GPUs—deep neural networks could succeed at scale, kicking off the modern era.

Today, Canadians both at home and abroad continue to play leading roles in AI research, safety, and policy—including at Anthropic. That’s why we’re committing $10 million CAD to Canadian research institutions to fund the next generation of this work. We’re also publishing our first Canadian country brief based on the Anthropic Economic Index, which provides a snapshot of how Canadians are putting Claude to work.

Investing in Canadian research

The $10 million we’re committing will fund research into beneficial and responsible applications of AI. As part of this, we’re announcing partnerships with Canada’s three leading regional AI institutes—Alberta Machine Intelligence Institute (Amii) in Edmonton, Mila in Montréal, and the Vector Institute in Toronto—along with CHEO, The Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CAMH), Université Laval, University of Toronto, and the University of Saskatchewan, with more partnerships to follow in the months ahead:

  • Amii, based in Edmonton, will provide Claude credits to its research and engineering teams to further their work in areas like reinforcement learning and AI trust and safety, as well as to increase AI adoption across Canada’s key economic sectors.
  • Mila, the Quebec AI institute home to the world’s largest concentration of academic deep learning researchers, will make Claude available to its community to support their research in areas including responsible AI, health, sustainability, multi-agent systems, and robotics. Mila will also use Claude to develop AI assistants that help researchers discover and assess scientific breakthroughs.
  • The Vector Institute in Toronto will use Claude credits to advance AI research in trust and safety, health and science, and the broader challenges that AI is uniquely positioned to help solve for Canadians.
  • CHEO and the CHEO Research Institute will use Claude credits to develop and evaluate AI-enabled approaches aimed at improving health outcomes and the care experience for children, youth, and families, and to study how AI can be most responsibly applied in children's health.
  • CAMH will make use of Claude credits across its research, education initiatives, and clinical projects. For example, CAMH’s Krembil Centre for Neuroinformatics will use Claude to conduct computational mental health research, including developing and evaluating predictive models of treatment for people with mental health conditions, and running large-scale evaluations of fairness in psychiatric AI systems. Credits will also be used to help scale the impact of the CAMH Global Learning Academy, which is developing multilingual, AI-enabled mental health education.
  • Université Laval’s Institute for Intelligence and Data will work with Claude to deepen researchers’ understanding of how LLMs behave in varied cultural contexts, as well as their understanding of low-resource languages and dialects, such as Quebec French and Indigenous languages.
  • The University of Saskatchewan will use Claude to further its research in areas including biomedical advancements, food and water security, public health, quantum computing, and public service.
  • The University of Toronto Data Sciences Institute will support a range of research projects through a scientific review-based process to access Claude API credits.

In addition to these donations, this summer Anthropic will add Amii, Mila, and Vector to the Anthropic for Startups program, which gives founders building on Claude access to a community and resources to support their growth. Hundreds of Canadian startups affiliated with these institutions will receive at least $5,000 USD each in API credits to continue to develop their businesses.

“Some of the foundations of modern AI came out of Toronto, Montréal, and Edmonton— and so, strikingly, did many of the researchers most committed to making it safe,” said Chris Olah, Co-Founder, Anthropic. “I was formed by that culture, and I’m proud Anthropic can support the next chapter.”

How Canada is using Claude

We’re also sharing data that looks at how people across Canada are using Claude. This is drawn from the March 2026 Anthropic Economic Index, our ongoing analysis of how AI is being incorporated into work tasks across the economy. Our economic research is based on data from real-world Claude usage, using a privacy-preserving analysis tool that identifies patterns in use while keeping all user information anonymous.

We find that Canada ranks eighth worldwide in Claude.ai use. Per person, Canadians use Claude at more than four times the rate the population predicts, and among the 10 countries where Claude is used most, only the US ranks higher.

Usage share and per-capita adoption among the top 10 countries by global Claude.ai use.
Bars show each country’s share of global AI usage (left panel) and the Anthropic AI Usage Index (right panel) based on 1M conversations sampled from Claude.ai in February 2026. Canada is highlighted in blue. The Anthropic AI Usage Index (AUI) measures whether Claude usage is over- or underrepresented in a country relative to its working-age population. Canada accounts for 2.6% of global Claude.ai consumer use, ranking eighth globally, and second by AUI. Sources: Anthropic Economic Index, February 2026; World Bank.

Within Canada, Claude adoption tracks the kind of work people do: British Columbia leads in terms of per-person use, with Ontario—which has the largest share of overall conversations—close behind. In both provinces, usage is higher than what we would expect to see based on population alone. Across the country, per-person usage is higher in provinces where professional, scientific, and technical work is concentrated.

Looking closer, we can see that how people use Claude lines up with the local economy. Translation requests are most common in provinces where more people work in government, likely because Canada’s bilingualism regulations require federal services and communications to be in both English and French. New Brunswick, Nova Scotia, and Québec lead the country in both government employment and the share of conversations about translation.

A shared view on the future of AI

The countries that invest the most in advanced AI over the next few years will also shape the rules that govern it. We’ve long believed democracies should lead that work, and Canada has a place at the forefront. Canada published the world’s first national AI strategy in 2017, and this June published its next: AI for All, which commits to strengthening the country’s AI safety institute, expanding AI literacy, and reinforcing the three national institutes that have anchored Canadian research for nearly a decade.

Last week we published a case study on the Government of Alberta, whose Ministry of Technology and Innovation used Claude Code to review 466 million lines of code across provincial systems in roughly 20 hours, then shared their methods with other governments.

The eight partnerships we’re announcing today are just the beginning of our investment in Canadian research. We look forward to supporting this work—in research, in hospitals, and in universities—for years to come.


Anthropic s’engage à verser 10 millions de dollars à la recherche canadienne en IA

Les institutions et les chercheurs canadiens jouent un rôle essentiel dans la révolution moderne de l’IA. À une époque où la recherche sur les réseaux neuronaux suscitait un scepticisme généralisé, l’Université de Toronto et l’Université de Montréal figuraient parmi les rares institutions à encourager la recherche dans ce domaine crucial, et des chercheurs de l’Université de l’Alberta menaient déjà des travaux fondateurs sur l’apprentissage par renforcement. Au début des années 2010, plusieurs instituts de recherche canadiens ont été parmi les premiers à démontrer qu’avec l’arrivée de nouvelles ressources informatiques puissantes (notamment le calcul générique sur processeurs graphiques), les réseaux neuronaux profonds pouvaient fonctionner à grande échelle, marquant ainsi le début d’une nouvelle ère.

Aujourd’hui, les Canadiens, tant au pays qu’à l’étranger, continuent de jouer un rôle de premier plan dans la recherche, la sécurité et les politiques entourant l’IA, notamment chez Anthropic qui, en juste retour des choses, a décidé de verser 10 millions de dollars canadiens à des instituts de recherche du pays afin de financer les prochaines avancées. Nous en profitons aussi pour publier notre première fiche d’information sur le Canada basée sur l’Anthropic Economic Index afin de donner un aperçu de la manière dont les Canadiens utilisent Claude.

Notre investissement dans la recherche canadienne

Les 10 millions de dollars que nous nous engageons à verser financeront divers projets de recherche sur les applications utiles et responsables de l’IA. Nous avons conclu des partenariats avec les trois principaux instituts régionaux canadiens spécialisés dans l’IA – soit l’Alberta Machine Intelligence Institute (Amii) à Edmonton, Mila à Montréal et l’Institut Vector à Toronto –, ainsi qu’avec le CHEO, le Centre de toxicomanie et de santé mentale (CAMH), l’Université Laval, l’Université de Toronto et l’Université de la Saskatchewan. D’autres partenariats devraient suivre au cours des prochains mois.

  • L’Amii, basé à Edmonton, mettra des crédits Claude à la disposition de ses équipes de recherche et d’ingénierie afin de leur permettre de poursuivre leurs travaux, notamment, sur l’apprentissage par renforcement ainsi que sur la confiance et la sécurité de l’IA en vue d’accroître l’adoption de l’IA dans les principaux secteurs économiques du Canada.
  • L’institut québécois d’intelligence artificielle Mila, qui regroupe la plus grande concentration au monde de chercheurs universitaires spécialisés dans l’apprentissage profond, mettra Claude à la disposition de ses équipes de recherche qui travaillent notamment sur l’IA responsable, la santé, le développement durable, les systèmes multiagents et la robotique. Mila utilisera également Claude pour développer des assistants IA qui aideront les chercheurs à faire des découvertes et à valider leurs résultats.
  • L’Institut Vector de Toronto utilisera des crédits Claude pour faire progresser la recherche en intelligence artificielle dans les domaines de la confiance et de la sécurité de même que de la santé et des sciences, mais aussi pour relever des défis locaux plus généraux que l’intelligence artificielle est particulièrement bien placée pour aider à résoudre.
  • Le CHEO et l’institut de recherche qui lui est affilié utiliseront des crédits Claude pour développer et évaluer des approches recourant à l’IA afin d’améliorer les résultats cliniques et l’expérience de soin des enfants, des jeunes et des familles, ainsi que pour étudier les applications pratiques responsables de l’IA en pédiatrie.
  • Le CAMH utilisera des crédits Claude dans diverses activités de recherche et d’éducation ainsi que dans des projets cliniques. Par exemple, le Centre Krembil de neuroinformatique du CAMH utilisera Claude pour mener des recherches informatiques en santé mentale, notamment en vue de développer et d’évaluer des modèles prédictifs pour le traitement des personnes souffrant de troubles mentaux, ainsi que pour réaliser des évaluations à grande échelle de l’équité des systèmes d’IA en psychiatrie. Ces crédits serviront également à renforcer l’impact du Centre éducatif mondial du CAMH, qui développe des programmes éducatifs multilingues sur la santé mentale assistés par l’intelligence artificielle.
  • L’Institut intelligence et données de l’Université Laval utilisera Claude pour approfondir la connaissance des chercheurs quant au comportement des grands modèles de langage (GML) dans divers contextes culturels, ainsi que leur connaissance des langues et dialectes disposant de moins de ressources, tels que le français québécois et les langues autochtones.
  • L’Université de la Saskatchewan utilisera Claude dans divers domaines de recherche, notamment la biomédecine, la sécurité alimentaire et l’approvisionnement en eau, la santé publique, l’informatique quantique et l’administration publique.
  • Le Data Sciences Institute de l’Université de Toronto utilisera des crédits API de Claude pour procéder à une revue scientifique visant à soutenir divers projets de recherche.

Outre ces dons, Anthropic intégrera cet été Amii, Mila et l’Institut Vector au Programme de jeunes pousses Anthropic, afin que les fondateurs qui travaillent avec Claude puissent accéder à une communauté et à des ressources capables d’appuyer leur croissance. Des centaines de jeunes entreprises canadiennes affiliées à ces institutions recevront chacune au moins 5 000 $ US sous forme de crédits API afin de poursuivre le développement de leurs activités.

« Certains fondements de l’IA moderne ont vu le jour à Toronto, Montréal et Edmonton, et c’est de là aussi, fait remarquable, que viennent bon nombre des chercheurs les plus engagés dans la sécurité de l’IA », a déclaré Chris Olah, cofondateur d’Anthropic. « J’ai grandi dans cette culture et je suis fier qu’Anthropic puisse contribuer à écrire un nouveau chapitre. »

Utilisation de Claude au Canada

Voici quelques données sur l’utilisation de Claude au Canada. Celles-ci sont tirées de l’édition de mars 2026 du rapport Anthropic Economic Index, qui fait régulièrement le point sur la manière dont l’IA est intégrée aux tâches professionnelles partout dans notre économie. Nos recherches économiques s’appuient sur des données issues de l’utilisation réelle de Claude, produites à l’aide d’un outil d’analyse respectueux de la vie privée qui mesure les tendances d’utilisation sans révéler l’identité des utilisateurs.

Le Canada occupe la huitième place mondiale en termes d’utilisation de Claude.ai. Par habitant, les Canadiens utilisent Claude plus de quatre fois plus que ce qui serait attendu considérant la taille de sa population. Parmi les dix pays où Claude est le plus utilisé, seuls les États-Unis le devancent sur ce point.

Part d’utilisation et taux d’adoption par habitant dans les dix pays qui utilisent le plus Claude.ai. Les barres indiquent la part de chaque pays (graphique de gauche) et l’indice d’utilisation de l’IA Anthropic (graphique de droite), calculés à partir d’un échantillon d’un million de conversations sur Claude.ai en février 2026. Le Canada est mis en évidence en bleu. L’indice d’utilisation de l’IA d’Anthropic (AUI) indique si l’utilisation de Claude est élevée ou faible dans un pays par rapport à sa population en âge de travailler. Le Canada représente 2,6 % de l’utilisation mondiale de Claude.ai, ce qui le place au huitième rang mondial, mais occupe le deuxième rang pour l’AUI. Sources : Anthropic Economic Index, février 2026; Banque mondiale.

Au Canada, l’adoption de Claude est reliée au type de travail de ses utilisateurs : la Colombie-Britannique arrive en tête en termes d’utilisation par habitant, suivie de près par l’Ontario, qui enregistre la plus grande part du nombre total de conversations. Dans ces deux provinces, le taux d’utilisation est supérieur à ce qui serait normalement attendu considérant la taille de la population. À l’échelle nationale, l’utilisation par habitant est plus élevée dans les provinces où se concentrent les emplois scientifiques, techniques et de services professionnels.

En y regardant de plus près, on constate que l’utilisation de Claude s’aligne sur les caractéristiques de l’économie locale. Les demandes de traduction sont plus fréquentes dans les provinces où les fonctionnaires sont plus nombreux, probablement parce que les lois sur le bilinguisme exigent que les services et les communications du gouvernement fédéral soient disponibles en anglais et en français. En fait, le Nouveau-Brunswick, la Nouvelle-Écosse et le Québec affichent à la fois les taux les plus élevés d’emploi dans la fonction publique et les plus grandes proportions de demandes d’aide à la traduction.

Perspective commune sur l’avenir de l’IA

Les pays qui investiront le plus dans l’IA de pointe au cours des prochaines années seront également ceux qui en définiront les règles. Nous sommes depuis longtemps convaincus que les démocraties doivent mener ces efforts et que le Canada peut y jouer un rôle de premier plan. Le gouvernement du Canada a publié en 2017 la première stratégie nationale au monde en matière d’IA, puis, en juin dernier, sa nouvelle stratégie intitulée « L’IA pour tous », qui prévoit renforcer les capacités de l’Institut canadien de la sécurité de l’IA, augmenter la littératie en IA et soutenir davantage les trois instituts nationaux qui sont à l’avant-garde de la recherche canadienne dans ce domaine depuis près d’une décennie.

La semaine dernière, nous avons publié une étude de cas sur le ministère de la Technologie et de l’Innovation du gouvernement de l’Alberta, où une équipe a utilisé Claude Code pour passer en revue 466 millions de lignes de code dans l’ensemble des systèmes provinciaux en environ 20 heures, puis a communiqué ses méthodes à d’autres gouvernements.

Les huit partenariats annoncés aujourd’hui ne sont qu’un commencement pour nos investissements dans la recherche canadienne. Nous sommes ravis à l’idée d’apporter notre soutien à ces travaux dans les instituts de recherche, les hôpitaux et les universités pour de nombreuses années encore.

Demis Hassabis, chief executive officer of DeepMind Technologies Ltd., during a panel session at the World Economic Forum (WEF) in Davos, Switzerland.
Image: Bloomberg via Getty Images
Demis Hassabis, during a panel session at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland. | Image: Bloomberg via Getty Images

Demis Hassabis thinks the world needs an AI watchdog with the power to hit the brakes if frontier models become too dangerous.

Writing in a blog post, the Google DeepMind CEO and cofounder said the US should lead the initiative, arguing that the country is the best place to set global standards "given its economic and technical standing." The organization, which could resemble existing regulators like the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, would be made up of leading independent experts and representatives from open-source communities and would have the authority to evaluate frontier models before they are released and coordinate an …

Read the full story at The Verge.

A rendering of the Reflect Orbital Eärendil-1 satellite.
Image: Reflect Orbital
Eärendil-1 is the first of many 60-foot space mirrors that Reflect Orbital is planning to launch into low Earth orbit. | Image: Reflect Orbital

Reflect Orbital has been given the green light to launch its first space mirror that aims to redirect sunlight down to Earth at night. The US Federal Communications Commission (FCC) has authorized the California-based startup to build and operate a single prototype satellite in low-Earth orbit later this year, despite concerns over how the technology could impact optical astronomy.

The satellite, named Eärendil-1 in reference to a Tolkien character, will attempt to redirect sunlight to specific areas on Earth after dark using a 59-foot (18-meter) reflective surface. If successful, Reflect Orbital plans to launch and operate a constellation …

Read the full story at The Verge.

SUMMARYScientists at the Indian Institute of Technology Madras have built Anchor, a free online 3D cellular atlas of the human brainstem that links whole-brain MRI views to individual neurons across more than 500 tissue sections. The map identifies more than 200 cell clusters and nerve pathways using high-resolution microscope images and eight chemical markers, offering a detailed reference for neuroscience and neurosurgery. Researchers hope it will improve understanding of conditions such as Alzheimer’s disease, Parkinson’s disease, stroke, and SIDS.

Scientists at the Indian Institute of Technology, Madras (IIT-M) have created what they describe as the world's most detailed 3D cellular atlas of the human brainstem, linking whole-brain MRI views to individual neurons across more than 500 tissue sections. The free online atlas, called Anchor, could help researchers better understand diseases such as Alzheimer's, Parkinson's, stroke, and SIDS by showing how healthy and diseased brain tissue differs cell by cell. The BBC reports: Built from high-resolution microscope images rather than costlier molecular techniques, it creates a detailed three-dimensional map of the brainstem, identifying more than 200 clusters of brain cells and nerve pathways. Eight chemical markers help distinguish different cell types, producing one of the clearest pictures yet of this vital, but poorly, understood part of the brain. The brainstem occupies only a sliver of the brain, yet it keeps people alive. It links the brain to the spinal cord and controls breathing, heartbeat, sleep, wakefulness and movement.

[...] Users can zoom from the whole brainstem seen on MRI down to individual neurons while maintaining their precise spatial relationships. The researchers have made the atlas freely available online, hoping it becomes a reference tool for neuroscientists, neurologists and neurosurgeons worldwide. Its applications could also extend well beyond anatomy. By comparing healthy brainstem maps with diseased tissue, scientists may better understand disorders ranging from Parkinson's disease and stroke to Alzheimer's disease and sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS). More precise maps could also help neurosurgeons navigate one of the brain's most delicate regions with greater confidence.

SUMMARYPsiQuantum is building a large photonic quantum computer that would use photons, beam splitters, and ultra-cold detectors to tackle problems far beyond today’s conventional machines. The company raised $1 billion, began work on sites in Chicago and Australia, and is partnering with GlobalFoundries to manufacture its chips. An Australian facility could be hardware-ready in 2027 and aims to connect about 100 cabinets in a full system.

The machine that could change the world will be housed in a room that looks like a data center crossed with an ice cream factory. Inside will be some 100 stainless-steel cabinets, each about six feet tall and connected to a supply of liquid helium that keeps them only a few degrees above absolute zero. Inside those cabinets will be hundreds of chips, and on those, thousands of particles of light flying through a maze of optical switches and beam splitters. Each photon must be accounted for, because precisely measuring where it ends up will help answer questions that current computers might take millions of years to solve.

This computer, as described, does not exist. It’s the brainchild of a company called PsiQuantum, founded in 2016 by four physicists from UK universities. In a crowded field of deep-pocketed competitors with similarly fantastical visions, the company aims to be first to fulfill its promise.

In the years since the physicist Richard Feynman first envisioned them in 1981, quantum computers have promised to speed up everything from medical research to AI by harnessing the qualities of quantum particles. Unlike normal computer bits, which can be either a 1 or 0, quantum bits can exist in multiple states at once. And combining enough of those quantum bits together could produce a computer capable of tasks well beyond the reach of today’s conventional machines. But even today’s best quantum prototypes are too small and error-prone to do anything useful.

That makes PsiQuantum’s promises for what its computers will ultimately do all the more bold. Consider the company’s hopes for predicting the effects of cytochrome P450 enzymes, which often break down drugs in the body. If pharma companies knew more precisely how they would work on a particular molecule, they could design more effective medications faster. Estimating this for a specific drug can take over 10 years with today’s methods, says Philipp Ernst, vice president of quantum applications for PsiQuantum, but “we aim to get it down to four minutes.”

construction worker installing the Mk2.1 cabinet
COURTESY OF PSIQUANTUM
The company’s chips will be contained in large cabinets. A quantum computer powerful enough to be commercially useful is expected to require roughly 100 of these cabinets connected together.

In a field full of such claims, PsiQuantum has attracted unusual investment and scrutiny for two reasons: It is one of the few companies aiming directly at building a large and useful machine, and it is already working with a major chip manufacturer to build its systems using existing semiconductor fabs. Its vision has attracted momentum: Last year, PsiQuantum raised $1 billion in funding and broke ground in Chicago on a site it’s building in partnership with local governments. It also has a second site in the works in Australia, which it promises will be operational—meaning hardware-ready—in 2027. And it’s one of just two companies (along with Microsoft) to reach the third stage of an intensive government evaluation program to see which quantum companies might succeed.

Evaluating whether PsiQuantum will do what it says is harder than, say, judging a drugmaker by its clinical trial results: Advances in quantum computing are incremental, opaque, and tough to verify from the outside. But the company is now approaching its prove-it moment, when years of closed-door work and hundreds of millions in investment will either culminate in a useful quantum computer or fall short. We could start to know which as soon as next year.

A new kind of machine

Terry Rudolph, one of PsiQuantum’s four founders, is soft-spoken and shaggy-haired. He was born in Malawi and learned only after earning his first physics degree that he is a grandson of the famed physicist Erwin Schrödinger. He later self-published a 150-page book to explain quantum computing to teenagers (my PR contact gave me a signed copy with a wink that said “We never expect anyone to actually read this,” but I can report that it is a funny and helpful book).

Around 2014, Rudolph and his cofounders became increasingly convinced that the quantum breakthroughs they were finding to be possible in theory might also be possible in a real machine. They eventually left their academic positions and divided the tasks before them: Rudolph worked on theory, Mark Thompson on engineering, Pete Shadbolt on scaling the technology up, and Jeremy O’Brien on articulating the vision and finding investors (O’Brien served as CEO until February; he’s been replaced by Victor Peng, a veteran of the semiconductor industry).

To understand why the quantum computer the company is building would be a big deal, consider how imprecise much of modern science remains. We cannot reliably predict, for example, which lithium-ion battery will catch fire or how quickly a critical aircraft component will corrode.

This isn’t just because these systems are complex, though they are. It’s that, at their core, they are governed by quantum mechanics. Subatomic particles don’t have well-defined properties—this location and that velocity—but instead occupy quantum states spread across many possibilities. And that in turn influences a range of atomic and molecular behavior. Schrödinger (Rudolph’s grandfather, remember) showed how to describe this haziness mathematically a century ago this year, but precisely carrying out the calculations on real-world systems quickly becomes unfeasible even for the best computers. Scientists cope with this gap using approximations, imperfect simulations, or experiments on animals.

""
WINNI WINTERMEYER
WINNI WINTERMEYER

PsiQuantum co-founder and chief scientific officer Pete Shadbolt (left), and machinery the company has built to manufacture its own barium titanate, a material with the perfect qualities for routing light particles (right).

Feynman, David Deutsch, and other physicists in the 1980s wondered if we could do better. Maybe such complexity could instead be modeled using a new kind of machine. Rather than using transistors that are only ever on or off, this one would use particles held in quantum states, manipulate them to perform calculations, and then measure them at the end for an answer. Using quantum systems to simulate quantum systems would for the first time allow a simulation of physics and chemistry that directly reflected reality. It would be an invaluable tool for designing new drugs, materials, or really anything affected by quantum mechanics. Revolutionary, in other words.

Humankind’s leaps in understanding how nature works have often resulted in the invention of powerful new tools, Rudolph told me. “I don’t think it’s a coincidence that the Industrial Revolution coincided with our ability to calculate and simulate the laws of Newtonian mechanics, the laws of thermodynamics,…the laws of classical electromagnetism,” he says. “Whenever we have more power to calculate and simulate and understand things, we build incredible machines that come from it.” He sees something similar coming with quantum computers.

Chasing photons

One mystery has always been which quantum thing—ions, atoms, or something entirely new engineered with quantum properties—could be made stable and controllable enough to use as a qubit, the basic unit in the quantum computing world. Quantum systems are delicate, and observing any particular particle causes it to collapse into one state rather than a superposition of multiple states. If this happens during the computation rather than at the end, it produces an error that must be corrected for. Too many of these means the computer fails to produce a useful answer.

Just as engineers in the early days of aviation weren’t sure whether airplane wings would be fixed or flap like a bird’s, we’re not yet sure which of these quantum things will work best. Google and IBM are betting on superconducting qubits, superconducting circuits made of aluminum or other metals. Intel is using electrons. PsiQuantum is using photons, the particles that make up light.

“Photons have lots of nice things going for them,” Rudolph says. They can maintain quantum states for a long time; indeed, the photons in the universe’s cosmic microwave background may have done so for billions of years. But photons also move fast and scatter easily. More importantly, two photons are more likely to pass through one other than interact. That makes them a challenging candidate for quantum computation, in which qubits need ways to influence one another.

For a while, this last flaw seemed to doom the idea of quantum computing with light. But in 2001, researchers from the Los Alamos National Laboratory and the University of Queensland found a loophole. They discovered they could essentially fake interactions between photons by sending the light particles through a network of beam splitters and detectors. Their paper changed everything. PsiQuantum was created to make the theory a reality.

Size was the first problem; previous plans would have required a computer as large as California. Mercedes Gimeno-Segovia, who was a PhD student of Rudolph’s in the early 2010s (after almost becoming a professional violinist instead), thought of a way for the machine to be smaller.

The basic process since then has been this: First create photons with lasers and then “entangle” them, exploiting a quantum phenomenon in which the particles no longer have individual states but instead share one. Next, route them through a maze of gates that perform computations, and finally read out details of their quantum state at the end, all while tracking and correcting for the errors that occur. Succeeding at each of these steps millions of times is not so much an engineering hurdle as a brick wall. And building the supply chain—like manufacturing new materials with the qualities to route individual photons around—is arduous.

COURTESY OF PSIQUANTUM
A sizable chunk of PsiQuantum’s funding is being spent on custom cooling machinery that uses tanks of liquid helium to cool the company’s chips. Shown here is part of the PsiQuantum’s cooling system at a facility in Milpitas, California.

To get a sense of it all, last year I joined Shadbolt at the SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory, in Menlo Park, California. The center has helped produce several Nobel Prizes and played a role in the 1968 discovery of quarks, fundamental building blocks of matter that make up protons and neutrons. But PsiQuantum set up shop there essentially to siphon liquid helium from SLAC’s giant cryoplant. This is what the company uses to cool its computing cabinets down to deep-space temperatures.

Right now the cabinets operate at 2 K, or -456 °F, but the goal is to be able to run them slightly warmer—at a balmy -452 °F. Most quantum approaches require the whole machine to be cooled to superconducting temperatures, so that much of the expense in running it will actually be spent on refrigeration. But photonic computers require only one piece to be this cold—the detectors that measure single photons at the end of the computation. And the required temperature can be a bit higher. (PsiQuantum said in May that it will spend some of the $100 million award in CHIPS Act funding it’s slated to get on these detectors).

The siphoning setup was a temporary solution; PsiQuantum now has its own cooling system at its testing facility in Milpitas, California, and is setting up a larger one at its production site in Australia next year. These helium systems represent some of the biggest capital expenditures for any quantum company and will consume a significant chunk of PsiQuantum’s $1 billion funding round.

In the afternoon we drove to a lab in San Jose, where I donned a cleanroom suit—a head-to-toe covering that keeps dust at bay—to watch the manufacture of a blueish crystal called barium titanate.

It’s prized by PsiQuantum because it quickly and reliably routes light particles with very little electrical input, keeping the precious photons undisturbed as they move through the circuit. But for all barium titanate’s theoretical value to the company, its structure makes it a pain to manufacture, and the material wasn’t available at scale when PsiQuantum got its start. The company, in what Rudolph told me was an agonizing decision, opted to make it in-house, requiring a massive investment. I saw a technician—operating at what looked like a giant pressure cooker—adding the base elements to several hoppers; then I watched through a porthole as the elements got heated, vaporized, and finally crystallized into a thin layer on a wafer disc. At that time each disc took about 12 hours to make; the company now says several are produced each day. The discs then get shipped to the chipmaker GlobalFoundries in Malta, New York, where PsiQuantum’s chips are made.

WINNI WINTERMEYER
WINNI WINTERMEYER

The company has invested heavily in making its own barium titanate, a material whose delicate crystalline structure is tedious to manufacture.

PsiQuantum’s bet is that this entire supply chain, byzantine as it might sound, will make the company more efficient than its competitors. That’s because, if you squint, it looks like a souped-up and high-precision version of the existing supply chain for silicon photonic chips, another type of technology that transmits information with light—one that’s already used in data centers. If PsiQuantum produces its chips at scale, it can take advantage of tools and infrastructure that already exist.

But it’s not a given that one working chip can easily be wired up to thousands more. That’s why the company is testing in phases: Its Milpitas site has connected three cabinets together, with 250 chips in each, but the next step is to scale the systems up and see whether the company’s techniques for correcting errors can keep up. Once the cooling system arrives at the Australian site late next year, the company says, it aims to connect about 100 cabinets together. Then PsiQuantum will work up to running the world-changing algorithms it has promised.

The timeline for this, it’s worth noting, is up for debate. News articles have said that 2027 is the year that PsiQuantum aims to have its first full-scale quantum computer come online at its Australian site, but the company insists the deadline has been misread, and that it only intends for its facility to be “operational” by the end of next year. That means cooling systems in place and ready for hardware to be installed, but no promises about what size computer will be ready. In an industry where timelines are perpetually in flux yet central to how companies are judged, that distinction isn’t trivial.

Into the unknown

The outsider with perhaps the best guess of whether PsiQuantum will succeed is the Pentagon. The US Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency—the Pentagon’s research and development arm—has been running an initiative to determine which of the boastful quantum companies might actually deliver. In the last year and a half, the heads of the program have been sounding more confident. Joe Altepeter, who ran the program until last year and proudly described himself as a “quantum skeptic,” told me in March 2025: “I am more optimistic now than I have been at any point in the past 10 years.” And in a statement earlier this year, his successor, Micah Stoutimore, said “it now seems likely that someone will build a utility-scale quantum computer by 2033,” referring to a machine that generates more value from its calculations than it costs to build and operate.

The program has been scrutinizing PsiQuantum’s systems since 2023, and last year placed the company into the third stage of a benchmarking initiative meant to determine whether the technology will actually work. But to the rest of the industry, PsiQuantum is sort of a black box.

COURTESY OF PSIQUANTUM
PsiQuantum has broken ground at the Illinois Quantum and Microelectronics Park outside Chicago, pictured here, and on another site in Moreton Bay, Australia. It aims to build large-scale quantum computers at each site.

“It is very hard for an outsider to evaluate,” says Scott Aaronson, a theoretical computer scientist at the University of Texas at Austin who runs a popular blog that often covers the industry. Other companies, like Google and Quantinuum, have regularly published results over the years demonstrating chips and systems with incremental improvement, publicly laying the engineering groundwork needed to eventually build large machines.

PsiQuantum has instead focused squarely on a commercial goal—a computer with one million qubits, which is the scale that researchers expect to unlock research currently not possible on normal computers. PsiQuantum often differentiates itself with this industrial-scale goal, but IBM, which debuted a development road map in 2020, has been progressively building bigger and bigger systems. It initially targeted 2028 for a large-scale, error-corrected system, a deadline that now appears to have been pushed out to 2030.

Making it useful

On top of actually building the machine, a major focus for PsiQuantum is getting the rest of the world to develop a plan for how to use it. PsiQuantum has announced partnerships with customers including the defense giant Lockheed Martin, which intends to use it for materials design; the automaker Mercedes, which wants it for battery design; and the aerospace manufacturer Airbus.

That these companies don’t have a computer to experiment with is not a problem, according to Ernst at PsiQuantum. “There’s a PlayStation 6 probably coming up from Sony next year or the year after, and people are programming those games right now,” he says. “This is, in principle, very similar.” (It’s a glib analogy but not an entirely empty one; the quantum algorithms for solving a research problem can be cracked even if there is not yet hardware to run them on.)

The idea is that experts in quantum information from both PsiQuantum and its customers will be able to translate design problems—say, the requirements for a battery in a Mercedes electric vehicle—into algorithms the computer could solve. The company offers a software package called Construct, which companies can use to design their own algorithms that might one day run on the computer.

The future of quantum computing hinges on these algorithms. Quantum computers get painted as a speedup for everything, but in reality, they’re suited to a subset of problems, and answering a question with this sort of machine requires the question to be formulated with very specific types of algorithms. People spend entire careers working on such algorithms, even if the computers to run them don’t exist yet. At their core, they use the rules of quantum mechanics to manipulate probabilities in ways that ordinary computers can’t.

The most famous example, and a reason the government is so interested in quantum computers, is Shor’s algorithm. It was developed in 1994 by the theoretical computer scientist Peter Shor and could effectively break many forms of encryption used online, for everything from credit card numbers to military intelligence. The thing keeping the world together, for now, is that nobody has a computer to run the algorithm on (and security experts are already launching new encryption methods that could withstand attacks from a quantum computer). PsiQuantum is researching how long its systems might take to run Shor’s algorithm.

WINNI WINTERMEYER
WINNI WINTERMEYER

PsiQuantum’s chips are manufactured at GlobalFoundries in Malta, New York, and tested at company headquarters in California. Both PsiQuantum and GlobalFoundries have been awarded federal CHIPS Act funding.

The company also published a paper in December in collaboration with Airbus, essentially seeing if a new algorithm developed by the authors could beat a classical computer in modeling fluid dynamics, like the turbulence around an airplane wing. Andrew Childs, an expert in quantum simulation, told me PsiQuantum achieved only a moderate speed increase over what today’s computers can do. “It’s probably unlikely that speedups like this will have a significant practical impact until we have very large-scale quantum computers,” he said in an email. (When I asked Ernst, he agreed the improvement was modest.)

Some of the algorithms PsiQuantum is working on are not expected to be perfected or even used in the first applications of its computer. Instead, its initial tasks might be more along the lines that Feynman envisioned way back in 1981: simulating the smallest particles of our world.

The company’s most significant research in this realm is in modeling quantum chemistry. Take those pesky P450 enzymes. More precisely understanding how they operate, PsiQuantum says, would allow for faster drug development and testing.

Last year, PsiQuantum published methods for doing these sorts of chemistry calculations on a quantum computer, along with another paper demonstrating an algorithm that can simulate the collision of two molecules and estimate the likelihood of different outcomes femtosecond by femtosecond (there are one quadrillion femtoseconds in a second). It’s a remarkable amount of detail not currently possible with today’s technology, and it would allow drug and materials researchers to simulate new chemical interactions.

Dominic Berry, who developed some of the core techniques used in the collision paper but isn’t involved in PsiQuantum, says the company made impressive improvements, but to do the simulations scientists are most curious about would require the algorithm to be made even faster and PsiQuantum’s early computer to have fewer errors than currently expected.

Until PsiQuantum’s computers are up and running, the breakthroughs that these research papers tease remain in the realm of theory. It’s a space where Rudolph operates quite comfortably. He told me that Alan Turing created the theory of classical computing with pen and paper, imagining how the 1s and 0s would be represented in the machine, and how with the right approach to logic you could compute almost anything.

“But there is no way that by hand, with a pen and paper, Turing was ever going to produce—you know—Minecraft and Facebook,” he says. That took more than 70 years of tinkering (during which we fortunately created more useful things than Minecraft and Facebook).

For all the time Rudolph spends dreaming up things quantum computers might do, in other words, people working on those problems are still stuck with pen and paper for now: “Until you have the actual machine in hand, you don’t have the opportunity to really explore its potential.”

This story was updated on July 14 to clarify how long DARPA’s quantum program has been evaluating PsiQuantum.

SUMMARYAstronomers detected erythrulose, a complex sugar found in raspberries and self-tanners, in a gas cloud near the center of the Milky Way using radio telescopes in Spain. The finding adds to evidence that prebiotic organic molecules are common in space, and the molecule can convert into a form believed to be important in the origins of life. The results were published in Nature Astronomy.

Astronomers have detected erythrulose, a sugar found in raspberries and self-tanners, in a gas cloud near the center of the Milky Way. While not essential for life itself, the molecule can convert into a form thought to be important for life's origins, adding evidence that key prebiotic ingredients may be widespread across the galaxy. The Associated Press reports: Using two dish-shaped radio telescopes in Spain, researchers collected data from a large gas cloud near the center of the Milky Way. They identified the sugar in gas form by comparing telescope signals to samples in the lab. It's the latest kind of sugar detected in space -- in a region crossed by NASA's twin Voyager, the farthest spacecraft to ever travel from Earth.

Scientists have found interesting chemistry in our galaxy, including building blocks for genetic material and parts of the cell. They spotted a cousin to table sugar near the center of the Milky Way about 25 years ago, and black grains from asteroid Bennu retrieved by NASA's Osiris-Rex spacecraft yielded other sugars, including a key DNA ingredient. The latest sugar isn't essential for life, but can easily convert to a form that's thought to be crucial to kick-starting life on Earth. And it's one of the most complex sugars spotted so far, said astrophysicist Erika Hamden with the University of Arizona. The results were published in the journal Nature Astronomy.

Loading more cached articles...