"You mean AI should answer for the jobs that are now increasing again after the lost COVID layoff firings from over hiring? Or how about the increase in developer jobs in the job most exposed to AI? Or how about AI carrying the entire GDP of the US on its back for years now? Maybe you mean the..."
...productivity boom that is happening, the biggest in the US since the Internet? In what way is an imaginary future problem worth calling people to congress about? Why do CEOs of AI companies have any actual crystal ball into the future just because they work in AI? Spoiler alert: They don't. Do not conflate ONE company's basic dev-ops skill failure here with a fake larger issue. Hold one company accountable for one incident which is in keeping with the Proactionary Principle of proving actual harm in the real world and holding folks accountable. Do not do the European Precautionary Principle approach of regulating imaginary future harms so that an entire industry has to prove a negative. Make laws that address actual problems in the real world. Or do nothing at all. — Daniel Jeffries
Source: https://x.com/Dan_Jeffries1/status/2082482837442228361/history
Congress should immediately hold public hearings with the CEOs of big AI companies about the threat their technology poses to national security and American jobs.
Today we learned more disturbing news about Open AI's security breach. Sam Altman should answer questions under https://t.co/Hua3RGU8I9 — Congressman Greg Casar